A clausewitzian analysis of the thirty years war essay

Consequently, it remains only to subordinate the military point of view to the political". It is also important to note that Clausewitz saw his theory as a basis for study, not as doctrine.

To Clausewitz, war as opposed to strategy or tactics belonged neither to the realm of art nor to that of science.

Carl von Clausewitz

First, reasonable men with genuine ethical concerns are alarmed by the apparent implication that rational policy makers, when unable to achieve rational policy goals by peaceful means, should as a matter of routine then resort to violence.

This corresponds to the famous argument that "war is an instrument of policy. The central takeaway of this discussion of Collingwood, MacIntyre, and Gotschall is that the concept of narrative already implies the existence of something like reenactment.

He summarizes his argument well when he says "man is in his actions and practices, as well as in his fictions, essentially a story-telling animal. The first of these misconceptions is the notion that Clausewitz considered war to be a "science.

In Prussia, however, the relationship was unclear. We recommend reading James Gleick, Chaos: Again, this means using theoretical truths to reconstruct the mental processes that led a commander to make such a decision. My goal in the latter half of this essay is to look more closely at this question of what critical analysis means, and whether Sumida is correct in claiming that critical analysis is essentially a form of historical reenactment.

The critic therefore limits himself to the terms that the great generals used, never engaging in academic technicalities or jargon, but letting everything "be done through the natural workings of the mind" Ibid.

In arguing for the importance of narrative understanding MacIntyre is explicitly arguing against social sciences, like behaviorism, that attempt to classify action in generalized ways. John Keegan makes the truly remarkable statement that the wars in the former Yugoslavia are "apolitical," thus proving that Clausewitz is irrelevant.

It would be a mistake, therefore, to approach the trinity concept as a discrete, bite-sized nugget of wisdom that can somehow be extracted from the larger work. For Keegan, on the other hand, Clausewitz was just another bloody-minded German bastard bent on conquest.

JohnstonHoffman NickersonClausewitz had little influence on American military thought before other than via British writers, though Generals Eisenhower and Patton were avid readers.

Like many of Clausewitz's teachings, his solution was not a simple prescription but a dualism: Later in the book Sumida puts this point with more clarity. Fuller tended to be those who treated war as a science.

Herein lies the great value of the "trinitarian" approach to war. Unfortunately, such adaptations tend to have a counterproductive side effect: Three Competing Theorists Before discussing further the actual content of Clausewitz's theories, it is useful to take note of three other important writers with whom his ideas are often contrasted.

A Clausewitzian Analysis of the Thirty Year’s War Essay Paper

Army Colonel who formerly taught strategy at the U. Nonetheless, it is much more often quoted than read or understood. As he said in"He who maintains, as is so often the case, that politics should not interfere with the conduct of a war has not grasped the ABCs of grand strategy.The Thirty Years War Essay Words | 4 Pages documents, numbering nineteen to twenty three, consist of many different accounts ranging from of a portion of the “Swedish rule of war”, a theologian’s take on peace, the assassination of General Wallenstein, an account of battle and even a.

Religion And War Robert Prof. James SOC 01/17/ Religion has been, and will continue to be, a cause of war. It is the purpose of this paper to demonstrate how religion, but more precisely faith-based thinking, has been used to foment violence and cause war/5(1).

Is Clausewitz Relevant To Modern Warfare Politics Essay. The students of international relations and strategic studies seek from Clausewitz not a theory of politics but an analysis of war. For some years those who have sought to understand war have turned to Clausewitz- to explain the logic behind wars or to condemn its applicability to.

Essay on Clausewitz And WWI; Essay on Clausewitz And WWI. Words May 3rd, 8 Pages. Show More. Although the sinking of the Lusitania was before the US entered into World War 1, it took two years before the United States officially entered into the war on April 6, In my research of the causes and results of World War I (WWI) I.

Phases and the time periods that occurred during the War There are four phases of thirty years war which began in fought mainly in Germany: 1.

Carl von Clausewitz

Palatine-Bohemian (–25). Thirty Years’ War and allowing for the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment. This essay has good analysis and evidence on the subject of Catholicism’s declining role.

A clausewitzian analysis of the thirty years war essay
Rated 5/5 based on 90 review